TSA nude body scanners made worthless by blog

Post Reply New Topic

This video is here to demonstrate that the TSA’s insistence that the nude body scanner program is effective and necessary is nothing but a fraud, just like their claims that the program is safe (radiation what?) and non-invasive (nude pictures who?). The scanners are now effectively worthless, as anyone can beat them with virtually no effort. The TSA has been provided this video in advance of it being made public to give them an opportunity to turn off the scanners and revert to the metal detectors. I personally believe they now have no choice but to turn them off.

Please share this video with your family, friends, and most importantly, elected officials in federal government. Make sure they understand that your vote is contingent on them fixing the abuse that 200,000 passengers face from the TSA on a daily basis.

My legal battle against the TSA’s nude body scanner and pat-down molestation program continues in court, soon with a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court. If you’d like to donate to this effort, send PayPal to: jon [at] fourtentech.com

I’d like to thank:

Travel Underground – http://www.travelunderground.org/

Freedom to Travel USA – http://fttusa.org/

Legislators who have stood up to the TSA – especially Dr. Ron Paul & Sen. Rand Paul

…and all those who have both publicly and privately stood up to the TSA.

I’m publishing this video because I want the world to know how much danger the American Transportation Security Administration is putting all us all in with their haste to deploy the expensive, invasive nude body scanner program. When the machines came out, we were told that the invasion on our privacy, doses of radiation, and trashing of our Constitution were necessary because the old metal detectors weren’t good enough. That “non-metallic explosives” were a threat, even though no one has boarded a plane in the US with any type of explosive in nearly 40 years. But while America was testing these devices, Rafi Sela, who ran security for Ben Gurion airport in Israel, which is known for being one of the most secure airports in the world, was quoted saying he could “overcome the body scanners with enough explosives to take down a Boeing 747,” and Ben Gurion therefore refused to buy scanners. The US ignored this warning, and Mr. Sela never publicly explained his statement. But it stuck with me.

As a scientist, engineer, and frequent traveler, as well as the first person to sue the TSA when they rolled out the scanners as primary in Nov. 2010, I studied and learned about both kinds of scanners currently in use by the TSA. Here are several images produced by TSA nude body scanners. You’ll see that the search victim is drawn with light colors and placed on a black background in both images. In these samples, the individuals are concealing metallic objects that you can see as a black shape on their light figure. Again that’s light figure, black background, and BLACK threat items. Yes that’s right, if you have a metallic object on your side, it will be the same color as the background and therefore completely invisible to both visual and automated inspection.

It can’t possibly be that easy to beat the TSA’s billion dollar fleet of nude body scanners, right? The TSA can’t be that stupid, can they?

Unfortunately, they can, and they are. To put it to the test, I bought a sewing kit from the dollar store, broke out my 8th grade home ec skills, and sewed a pocket directly on the side of a shirt. Then I took a random metallic object, in this case a heavy metal carrying case that would easily alarm any of the “old” metal detectors, and walked through a backscatter x-ray at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport. On video, of course. While I’m not about to win any videography awards for my hidden camera footage, you can watch as I walk through the security line with the metal object in my new side pocket. My camera gets placed on the conveyer belt and goes through its own x-ray, and when it comes out, I’m through, and the object never left my pocket.

Maybe a fluke? Ok, let’s try again at Cleveland-Hopkins International Airport through one of the TSA’s newest machines: a millimeter wave scanner with automated threat detection built-in. With the metallic object in my side pocket, I enter the security line, my device goes through its own x-ray, I pass through, and exit with the object without any complaints from the TSA.

While I carried the metal case empty, by one with mal-intent, it could easily have been filled with razor blades, explosives, or one of Charlie Sheen’s infamous 7 gram rocks of cocaine. With a bigger pocket, perhaps sewn on the inside of the shirt, even a firearm could get through. It’s important to note that any metal object of any size can use this technique. …and I don’t urge you to try to bring contraband through security, as the nude body scanners often have false positives: so while the metal on your side might get through, a button on your shirt or a sweaty armpit might “look suspicious” and earn you a pat down anyway.

Now, I’m sure the TSA will accuse me of aiding the terrorists by releasing this video, but it’s beyond belief that the terrorists haven’t already figured this out and are already plotting to use this against us. It’s also beyond belief that the TSA did not already know everything I just told you, and arrogantly decided to disregard our safety: anything to force Americans to give up our liberty to the federal government and our tax dollars to companies that are in bed with that government. The nude body scanner program is nothing but a giant fraud, which should come as no surprise after the Fast & Furious scandal that sent thousands of guns to Mexican drug cartels and cost a Customs and Border Patrol agent his life. THIS is a disgrace. So let’s fix this problem — now — before the terrorists take this opportunity to hurt us: the TSA must immediately end the nude body scanner program, and return to the tried-and-true metal detectors that actually work, and work without invading our privacy, as well as implement better solutions for non-metallic explosives, such as bomb-sniffing dogs and trace detection machines.

/ ... /

Beauty_pact, you'll need to truncate your article please so that you don't have the whole thing pasted. thanks!

very interesting!

Done... removed a bit from it.

hyperlexian, since you live in Canada, do you know if there still are airports, in Canada, where they don't use the nude scans? Can U.S. citizens (and Canadians) still travel/move abroad, with integrity, by flying via Canada?

no, we mostly all use them too - all of the international aitports, definitely.

no, we mostly all use them too - all of the international aitports, definitely.

Wow, that's terrible. Fùck humanity. Incredible. If only some people with a high sense of morality would wipe out all the TSA workers, and their other sex offender equivalents.

What about private planes? Or have the TSA and its equivalents already targeted those, too?

They were worthless before they were even fitted.

See these articles:
http://gizmodo.com/5865487/insider-56-b ... ty-is-junk
http://gizmodo.com/5768502/undercover-t ... five-times
http://gizmodo.com/5843506/tsa-scanners ... ny-clothes
http://gizmodo.com/5819940/how-did-a-st ... lue-flight
http://gizmodo.com/5714865/the-tsa-let- ... n-airplane
http://gizmodo.com/5674675/british-airw ... t-security

There's also another article, though I now forgot where I saw it, which talks to someone from an Israeli airport - which have the best security of all the airports in the world - who said the body scanners were useless too. This was back in 2010.

As is always the case with America, they simply do what they want without taking time to look at the facts or consequences.

Wow, that's terrible. Fùck humanity. Incredible. If only some people with a high sense of morality would wipe out all the TSA workers, and their other sex offender equivalents.

But this is just more of the same kind of journalism, its hearsay, one advisers view, eagerly picked up by readers cos they are scared of the word radiation and having the outline of their breasts seen.

Breasts and radiation gets your NT ant readers, your herd behaviour.
Dont that make you circumspect in your opinion?

I want to see real data, evidence of success and failure, dont you?
There is none in any of the stories I have seen, yet when people sell people security equipment, trials of the science are usually involved.

Why dont you both ask an expert in radiation and security (perhaps at a University) what they think rather than going with the whip it up media?