Page 1 of 9 [ 129 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next


censorship
Censorship should never be used 50%  50%  [ 25 ]
It should only be used if it protects the public from harm 28%  28%  [ 14 ]
Censorship prevents stupidity and opposition so I am all for it 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Not sure 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Should be used in moderation if the situation calls for it 20%  20%  [ 10 ]
Total votes : 50

artrat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Nov 2011
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,269
Location: The Butthole of the American Empire

29 May 2012, 12:05 pm

What are your views on the subject of censorship? When,where and why should it be used if ever?


_________________
?During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" ~George Orwell

"I belive in God, only I spell it Nature."
~ Frank Llyod Wright


ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

29 May 2012, 12:08 pm

Only during times of declared war and then as little as possible.

ruveyn



Shatbat
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,791
Location: Where two great rivers meet

29 May 2012, 12:10 pm

I don't believe in censorship, I see it as a form of deceit.


_________________
To build may have to be the slow and laborious task of years. To destroy can be the thoughtless act of a single day. - Winston Churchill


DC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,477

29 May 2012, 12:14 pm

I am generally against censorship nothing good ever comes from oppressing people's right to freedom of speech and thought, a lesson certain mods could do with learning...


There are certain areas where I think it is acceptable, child porn or an idiot's guide to hacking into the nuclear command control system or reporters giving away useful details of ongoing military operations are examples where I find it sensible.



Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

29 May 2012, 12:38 pm

The censorship debate is something I am wary of. The balance between censorship and freedom of speech is a very fine line.

And with some topics that are controversial (e.g. hate speech) it's hard to know where the line is.

I personally find hate speech repulsive, but does that mean we should take away someones right to freedom of speech when it comes to that simply because we disagree with it or because it is harmful?

If it does become harmful, with large numbers of people following or engaging in such actions stemming from it, censoring it may be the only way to go to prevent further such actions or sentiments from spreading.

Alternatively, censoring it may only cause it to go underground or receive a sizable backlash, more attention, or more people being drawn to it that would not have otherwise occured if you hadn't censored it.


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


enrico_dandolo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 866

29 May 2012, 12:48 pm

It is more useless [EDIT: typo, "useful"] that there be a free press. It lets out steam. It's not like newspapers change anything.



Last edited by enrico_dandolo on 31 May 2012, 3:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

DC
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2011
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,477

29 May 2012, 2:14 pm

enrico_dandolo wrote:
It is more useless that there be a free press. It lets out steam. It's not like newspapers change anything.


Have you been living under a rock the last year?

Murdoch phone hacking inquiry pass you by?

The one where celebrities, politicians and the police all admit to being terrified of the press and their power to destroy careers with false gossip or bury potentially career ending indiscretions so that you sail on unscathed?

Or how after the press created the MMR scare, parents stopped vaccinating their children and case of fatal measles, mumps and rubella went up hugely? etc, etc, etc.



Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

29 May 2012, 2:24 pm

I am against censorship but I am for censureship


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


Mummy_of_Peanut
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Feb 2011
Age: 51
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,564
Location: Bonnie Scotland

29 May 2012, 2:53 pm

I wonder what this place would be like, with the spammers and trolls being allowed to roam freely (that's what no censorship would entail). As an example, one troll could easily churn out a whole page of topic headings, in minutes. I don't think I'd use places like this at all, if they weren't censored somewhat.


_________________
"We act as though comfort and luxury were the chief requirements of life, when all we need to make us really happy is something to be enthusiatic about." Charles Kingsley


Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

29 May 2012, 3:02 pm

Mummy_of_Peanut wrote:
I wonder what this place would be like, with the spammers and trolls being allowed to roam freely (that's what no censorship would entail). As an example, one troll could easily churn out a whole page of topic headings, in minutes. I don't think I'd use places like this at all, if they weren't censored somewhat.


Banning trolls, spammers, and locking violating threads, is not censorship, it is enforcement of the rules. Is it censorship to refuse a violent television show on a family friendly channel?


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


edgewaters
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Aug 2006
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,427
Location: Ontario

29 May 2012, 3:34 pm

Vigilans wrote:
Mummy_of_Peanut wrote:
I wonder what this place would be like, with the spammers and trolls being allowed to roam freely (that's what no censorship would entail). As an example, one troll could easily churn out a whole page of topic headings, in minutes. I don't think I'd use places like this at all, if they weren't censored somewhat.


Banning trolls, spammers, and locking violating threads, is not censorship, it is enforcement of the rules. Is it censorship to refuse a violent television show on a family friendly channel?


I don't see it so much that way exactly ... it's more like WP is someone's megaphone or other communication tool. They share it under certain conditions. They're not robbing you of freedom of speech if they attach conditions to using the megaphone; it's their stuff.

Censorship is when you're forbidden from using any megaphone, including your own, to communicate something. No website can take your freedom of speech away. They can attach conditions to sharing their stuff, because it's theirs, but that's not censorship.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 120
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

29 May 2012, 3:35 pm

Vigilans wrote:
Banning trolls, spammers, and locking violating threads, is not censorship, it is enforcement of the rules


Your nose is looking mighty brown, lately. :wink:

Vigilans wrote:
. Is it censorship to refuse a violent television show on a family friendly channel?


For the government to refuse it? Or for the owner of the channel to refuse it?



Kjas
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,059
Location: the place I'm from doesn't exist anymore

29 May 2012, 4:04 pm

artrat wrote:
What are your views on the subject of censorship? When,where and why should it be used if ever?


artrat,

Just to clarify, was your question intended to be taken in the general context as per the norm for this sub-forum, or in the context of censorship on WP?


_________________
Diagnostic Tools and Resources for Women with AS: http://www.wrongplanet.net/postt211004.html


Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

29 May 2012, 5:20 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Banning trolls, spammers, and locking violating threads, is not censorship, it is enforcement of the rules


Your nose is looking mighty brown, lately. :wink:


Really? I have nothing to gain by voicing my opinion. Furthermore, the TOS is not really a matter of opinion. Feel free to go and read it any time you like, or feel free to be a fool and throw insinuations around, I don't particularly care about your view on my motivations, though it says a lot about yours that you accuse me of brown nosing when my post was in disagreement with a mod's interpretation of censorship

ArrantPariah wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
. Is it censorship to refuse a violent television show on a family friendly channel?


For the government to refuse it? Or for the owner of the channel to refuse it?


For the owner of the station, obviously.


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do


HerrGrimm
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 987
Location: United States

29 May 2012, 5:31 pm

ruveyn wrote:
Only during times of declared war and then as little as possible.

ruveyn


My thoughts exactly.


_________________
"You just like to go around rebuking people with your ravenous wolf face and snarling commentary." - Ragtime


Last edited by HerrGrimm on 29 May 2012, 5:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Vigilans
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jun 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,181
Location: Montreal

29 May 2012, 5:31 pm

edgewaters wrote:
Vigilans wrote:
Mummy_of_Peanut wrote:
I wonder what this place would be like, with the spammers and trolls being allowed to roam freely (that's what no censorship would entail). As an example, one troll could easily churn out a whole page of topic headings, in minutes. I don't think I'd use places like this at all, if they weren't censored somewhat.


Banning trolls, spammers, and locking violating threads, is not censorship, it is enforcement of the rules. Is it censorship to refuse a violent television show on a family friendly channel?


I don't see it so much that way exactly ... it's more like WP is someone's megaphone or other communication tool. They share it under certain conditions. They're not robbing you of freedom of speech if they attach conditions to using the megaphone; it's their stuff.

Censorship is when you're forbidden from using any megaphone, including your own, to communicate something. No website can take your freedom of speech away. They can attach conditions to sharing their stuff, because it's theirs, but that's not censorship.


That is another valid way of looking at it.


_________________
Opportunities multiply as they are seized. -Sun Tzu
Nature creates few men brave, industry and training makes many -Machiavelli
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do