I would find my self to be considered agnostic. Because there is clearly much more going on in the universe than can be comprehended with meer science. Logicly though it is impossible for there to be a single infallible god since the universe is clearly a giant game of "Rock, Paper, Scisiors." There for if there is only one god it cannot be totaly infallible since if it were it would nullify all of exitance out right because it would already know the outcome of existance and it would be impossible to percive reality since it would beable to veiw any point in "history" without having to veiw exiatnce in order. Hence it stands to reason that in the case of a single god there is at least one variable of sorts being tested which may or may not be "free will." This is similar to Plato's theory of the "Clockwork Universe" and/or "Clockwork God." Then the only oher general possibility is that of polytheism, which all known have pretty well been debunked. However that does not mean that it is nessiarly impossible. Yet it is clearly impossible for anyone religion to be completely correct since humans are in their very nature imperfect. So it stands to reason that since their is a much more vast amount of unexplored possibities than world religions, that it is more likely that no one is even close.
_________________
"No matter how many instances of white swans we see, we must never assume that all swans are white." ~Sir Karl Popper
*I picked this username 4 years ago when I was in high school. Don't hold it against me.