If you could cure yourself of Asperger's, would you?
For myself, I'd have to consider it, but ultimately, I probably would cure myself of it since I often feel like I'm on a different wave length to most other people, and my Autistic awkwardness can make certain situations challenging and embarrassing. Additionally, I feel I'm not a very approachable person, and I'd have to say at least some of that can be attributed to my AS.
So what about you? If you could cure yourself of Asperger's Syndrome, would you? Why/Why not?
Interesting perspective, but I would disagree. It's a part of you, sure, but it doesn't define you as a person. It's still a condition.
You would be different if you didn't have it, but that doesn't necessarily mean you wouldn't still be you.
I see where you're coming from, but this isn't about stigma, this is about how I function, and how I'm consequently viewed in life. It's not so much about seeing AS as a disease, but it's hard to dispute that people with AS are inherently different, and thus, are viewed differently. If the rest of the world had Asperger's Syndrome and I was neurotypical, I'm pretty confident that unless being neurotypical gave me an advantage over everyone else, I'd wish I had Asperger's Syndrome. Just the same way that if being morbidly obese was common and attractive, I'd want to be morbidly obese, but it's really not, so I really don't. It's all just pack mentality.
Now, what would being normal do for me... :
-beautiful wife and kids; probably ends in divorce and for the thing to repeat itself
-awesome job and degree; which takes up all of my time so I can't do as much of the "small" things I like
-"wealthy", so I don't know what it's like to appreciate the "small" things as much
Nah, I'll stay autistic.
Yes, I would. I don't think such a thing would ever be possible, though. They're more likely going to be able to find a way to prevent people from ever being autistic than to cure those already with it I'd imagine. I'd imagine cures would be risky as it'd probably involve messing around with the brain. If it was risk free I'd want to. I'd like to be able to go places without everything being too loud for me. To be able to talk well when I need to. It'd be very nice.
A cure probably won't ever be viable, but I'm really just asking because I'm curious as to whether people with high-functioning Autism would eradicate their condition if it was possible
Interesting perspective, but I would disagree. It's a part of you, sure, but it doesn't define you as a person. It's still a condition.
I do see it as a defining part of me; just like "gay", "transsexual" and "redneck" are things that define a person.
of course, everyone is allowed his/her own opinions, but this is mine
-beautiful wife and kids; probably ends in divorce and for the thing to repeat itself
-awesome job and degree; which takes up all of my time so I can't do as much of the "small" things I like
-"wealthy", so I don't know what it's like to appreciate the "small" things as much
Nah, I'll stay autistic.
I voted cure pls, and you don't have to do this as NT and there are more advantages...
but I like your perspective.
Interesting perspective, but I would disagree. It's a part of you, sure, but it doesn't define you as a person. It's still a condition.
I do see it as a defining part of me; just like "gay", "transsexual" and "redneck" are things that define a person.
of course, everyone is allowed his/her own opinions, but this is mine
Fair point, but if a gay person woke up one day and realised their sexual preference had suddenly changed to the opposite sex, would they be a different person?
Interesting perspective, but I would disagree. It's a part of you, sure, but it doesn't define you as a person. It's still a condition.
You would be different if you didn't have it, but that doesn't necessarily mean you wouldn't still be you.
A cure would likely require physical changes to your brain. We'd likely not be ourselves in the same way that other people with physical alterations of their brains are not themselves anymore.
I would not want to cure my Autism. It might be nice to be able to ride public transportation and eat the foods that everyone else eats, but I'd have to give up my stimming, which is profoundly relaxing and enjoyable to me, and I'd have to give up my strong senses including my ability to differentiate sound and my ability to taste mild tastes. I'd rather just drive and eat my own foods and keep my sensory abilities.
I'd like to be less socially awkward and for socialization and speech to require less concentration. However, I'd have to give up my near-photographic memory, my special interests (like the law), and my Autistic-level concern for what is "fair". I wouldn't have ever gone to law school, so therefore, not only would I not have my career, but I would also not have my husband (who I met in law school) and the three children that resulted from our marriage. I'd much rather have my husband and children and have to work a bit harder to interact with the outside world.
I'll also probably never get dementia, as research suggests that Autistic people do not get dementia due to our greater neuroplasticity. My grandmother died of demetia and Parkinson's, and it was miserable for her and for my family. It hurt my grandfather most when he went to see her in the nursing home for their anniversary and she didn't even know who he was. I'd rather be socially awkward than ever hurt my husband like that.
Yes, some of my Autistic traits make many things more difficult. However, many Autistic traits are assets. My assets make me who I am more than my difficulties, and I like my Autistic assets more than I dislike my Autistic disabilities.
Interesting perspective, but I would disagree. It's a part of you, sure, but it doesn't define you as a person. It's still a condition.
I do see it as a defining part of me; just like "gay", "transsexual" and "redneck" are things that define a person.
of course, everyone is allowed his/her own opinions, but this is mine
Fair point, but if a gay person woke up one day and realised their sexual preference had suddenly changed to the opposite sex, would they be a different person?
Many gay people would say "yes," and there is genetic research to suggest that your sexual orientation is in your genes. If your genes changed, you would change.
If it was completely genetic it'd never exist, though. I'd like to see this research. Link?
Why?
NTs can have photographic memory and deep interests, too. And I'm sure at least 99% of the people at law school are NTs, so I don't see why you wouldn't. Not sure what you mean by "autistic-level concern for what is "fair"", though.
Source?
Jacoby
Veteran
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 32
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash
I could care less...
Whether I'm an aspie or not, I'll find ways to navigate in this NT dominated world.
In fact, I'm quite closer to find how to be approachable to NTs at the same time as an aspie/autistic and as myself in the current culture I'm into. So, I don't need to be someone else to fit in, nor lie through my life to gain certain "NT privileges".
In my opinion, the only thing I might gain as an NT is sensory filter and their social instinct, not instant success. Yet I know there are ways around to gain them without becoming NT.
_________________
Gained Number Post Count (1).
Lose Time (n).
Lose more time here - Updates at least once a week.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Is it wrong to want a cure for myself? |
22 May 2024, 4:21 am |
Whats the cure for adhd?
in Bipolar, Tourettes, Schizophrenia, and other Psychological Conditions |
04 Jun 2024, 2:29 pm |
Pastor Asperger |
13 May 2024, 5:52 pm |
Have you ever disputed having autism/Asperger's? |
30 Apr 2024, 3:58 am |