grain-and-field wrote:
DentArthurDent wrote:
Actually given your revolting veiws. I think oscuria is being remarkably polite.
ok, so you are calling my opinion "revolting". I guess it was not you who wrote any of these free speech laws that we have today in our society. You obviously dont fancy free speach.
Free speech ensures the ability for one to speak their mind; not for it to be accepted, supported, or applauded by others. You have your say... but you must also recognize the right of others to speak their minds to the contrary of your beliefs. I cannot agree with Monty's suggestion of arbitrary dismissal of such speech, as it is up to the mind of individual to assess and determine for themselves. I can say wholeheartedly that I disagree with your theory. In your original post, you actually post "there are (sic) strong evidence that supports" your theory, then backtrack in your reply... which, I must admit, makes one even more skeptical of your claims. Your theory has no evidence, no justification, no merit yet shown... all I see is something to make oneself feel better, to hurt or put down another group, something illusory and designed to provoke a reaction instead of being purposeful. Since then, you refuse to substantiate your "views" and instead start creating drama when others speak their mind. Considering the content of your opinion 'revolting' is in no way affecting your right to free speech; it is his opinion, much as your views are your own.
M.
_________________
My thanks to all the wonderful members here; I will miss the opportunity to continue to learn and work with you.
For those who seek an alternative, it is coming.
So long, and thanks for all the fish!