The mental hygiene movement and autism

Page 1 of 3 [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Woodpeace
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 474
Location: Lancashire, England

05 Mar 2009, 7:29 am

The purpose of the mental hygiene movement which flourished in the United States and Canada in the first three or four decades of the 20th century was to make people "think better, feel better and act better".

The central importance given by the mental hygiene movement to personality development in children meant that the school system had a significant responsibility for this development. Advocates of the mental hygiene movement in schools were convinced by the result of IQ tests of the necessity for more special classes together with the early identification of problems.

By the 1920s mental hygienists were

Quote:
convinced that psychiatry had identified a specific susceptibility to mental disorder, a specific symptomology, a specific constellation of personality traits: shyness, daydreaming, withdrawal, introversion, the 'shut-in' personality were psychiatric danger signals, an early warning system of serious mental illness, even of dementia praecox.
(Cohen. S. 1983. The mental hygiene movement, the development of personality and the school: The medicalization of American education. History of Education Quarterly 23: pp. 123-149.). It is available online here: http://www.jstor.org/stable/368156 .

These would have included autistic children, though at the time autism was not a diagnostic category. Majia Halmer Nadesan writes in her book Constructing Autism: Unravelling the "Truth" and Understanding the Social , Routledge (2005) that
Quote:
by the 1930s in North America and Europe the mental hygiene and child guidance movements had created the conditions of possibility for psychiatric diagnoses of both severe and mild forms of deviant behavior, particularly social behavior in children. It was in this context that Leo Kanner and Asperger identified and described autism and (what has come to be called) Asperger's syndrome."
Much of that book is published online here: http://www.google.co.uk/books?id=n8NQNYorbxcC .

Eugenics was the extremist, pseudo-scientific fringe of the mental hygiene movement.



Postperson
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2004
Age: 68
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,023
Location: Uz

05 Mar 2009, 7:32 am

these days i would think they should be identifying sociopaths at school. but i suppose that's too sensible.

I certainly wasn't regarded as a problem at school and I was born in 1957. The only kids who were a 'problem' were the ones who were completely unable to keep up with the academic requirements and these kids tended to get selected out, examined, and often, sent off to a 'special' school. I think their parents were often told they were ret*d or 'simple'.



ManErg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,090
Location: No Mans Land

05 Mar 2009, 9:19 am

Woodpeace wrote:
Majia Halmer Nadesan writes in her book Constructing Autism: Unravelling the "Truth" and Understanding the Social , Routledge (2005) that
Quote:
by the 1930s in North America and Europe the mental hygiene and child guidance movements had created the conditions of possibility for psychiatric diagnoses of both severe and mild forms of deviant behavior, particularly social behavior in children. It was in this context that Leo Kanner and Asperger identified and described autism and (what has come to be called) Asperger's syndrome."
Much of that book is published online here: http://www.google.co.uk/books?id=n8NQNYorbxcC .



Woodpeace wrote:
Eugenics was the extremist, pseudo-scientific fringe of the mental hygiene movement.


It still lurks in the shadows. One problem is how we define what a "perfect" or "better" human actually is. The rule of thumb would appear to be "just like me". There is no objective specification or manual that details what a human should be. Has anyone ever heard of a eugenicist who's selection criteria excludes himself? :)

BTW The Nadesan book looks absolutely fascinating! Thanks for the link. After reading some of the extracts, I'm going to have to buy it. I support the idea that health, especially mental health, has a large amount of cultural influence on it. Although maybe that belief is just a symptom of my own flaws?


_________________
Circular logic is correct because it is.


ManErg
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Apr 2006
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,090
Location: No Mans Land

05 Mar 2009, 9:29 am

Postperson wrote:
I certainly wasn't regarded as a problem at school and I was born in 1957. The only kids who were a 'problem' were the ones who were completely unable to keep up with the academic requirements and these kids tended to get selected out, examined, and often, sent off to a 'special' school. I think their parents were often told they were ret*d or 'simple'.


Born only a few years later, that reflects my experience, too. In hindsight, I did have terrible problems at school, but as I was academically ahead of the pack, I was not defined as a 'problem'. Probably would be singled out now as the emphasis on 'social skills' in children from the day they are born has increased greatly.

In some ways, the academic aspects have been dumbed down, in part due to the collective guilt at that labelling you describe. Things turn full circle and maybe one day there will be collective guilt at the way that introverted children (and adults) are treated these days.


_________________
Circular logic is correct because it is.


ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,534

05 Mar 2009, 9:40 am

Hmmm......mental hygeine.......it may have its good points, but the name has a creepy ring to it, don't you think?



cosmiccat
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,504
Location: Philadelphia

05 Mar 2009, 11:43 am

Sounds like they want to clean out your mind. Scary! Like the dentist's office. "Have you been flossing your mind regularly like we discussed on your last visit?" Sound of the drill in the next room. "Looks like you may have to have a few thoughts pulled."
(Extraction of the Stone of Madness) The cure of folly.



ToughDiamond
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2008
Age: 72
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,534

05 Mar 2009, 1:42 pm

Indeed.....though I guess it shows how our culture has moved on since those days, given that they could get away with it. If I remember right, even as recently as the 1950s and 60s, such a phrase wouldn't have aroused any public suspicion, though I knew no radical people back then. I myself would have been quite happy with the notion of psychiatry as a clean-up tool, much as a physician might fight infection of the body. Lovely new disinfectants were at last killing a lot of the horrific germs that used to kill people. "Sanitisation" was a positive notion for me for many years.

It looks like a good read, the way the experience of autism may be different as the social environment changes over the years. I've often marvelled at how much of an Aspie paradise my early school days seems to have been. I loved it, focussing in calm, quiet conditions with an absolutely clear remit and rigid, reliable routines.



gina-ghettoprincess
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Nov 2008
Age: 30
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,669
Location: The Town That Time Forgot (UK)

05 Mar 2009, 2:04 pm

The name sounds like they're gonna wash your mind out with soap. Hey, I wouldn't put it past some of these nutjobs...


_________________
'El reloj, no avanza
y yo quiero ir a verte,
La clase, no acaba
y es como un semestre"


ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

10 Mar 2009, 4:56 pm

Woodpeace wrote:
The central importance given by the mental hygiene movement to personality development in children meant that the school system had a significant responsibility for this development. By the 1920s mental hygienists were
Quote:
convinced that psychiatry had identified a specific susceptibility to mental disorder, a specific symptomology, a specific constellation of personality traits: shyness, daydreaming, withdrawal, introversion, the 'shut-in' personality were psychiatric danger signals, an early warning system of serious mental illness, even of dementia praecox.

(Cohen. S. 1983. The mental hygiene movement, the development of personality and the school: The medicalization of American education. History of Education Quarterly 23: pp. 123-149.). It is available online here: http://www.jstor.org/stable/368156 .

Majia Halmer Nadesan Constructing Autism: Unravelling the "Truth" and Understanding the Social , Routledge (2005), [ some of which ] is published online here: http://www.google.co.uk/books?id=n8NQNYorbxcC

Very interesting. Thank you for the links/refs.

.



MissConstrue
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 17,052
Location: MO

10 Mar 2009, 5:03 pm

When I see the words mental hygiene, I can't help but think of what they use to do to people who were a "problem"....lobotomy! :hmph:


_________________
I live as I choose or I will not live at all.
~Delores O’Riordan


Glencannon
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 22 Jan 2008
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 138
Location: Missoula, MT

10 Mar 2009, 5:19 pm

Mental Hygiene is nothing more than a fancy euphamism for Brain Washing.



ooOoOoOAnaOoOoOoo
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,265

10 Mar 2009, 9:49 pm

I've heard of dental hygienist but not mental hygienist.



Padium
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Dec 2008
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,369

10 Mar 2009, 10:02 pm

Postperson wrote:
these days i would think they should be identifying sociopaths at school. but i suppose that's too sensible.

I certainly wasn't regarded as a problem at school and I was born in 1957. The only kids who were a 'problem' were the ones who were completely unable to keep up with the academic requirements and these kids tended to get selected out, examined, and often, sent off to a 'special' school. I think their parents were often told they were ret*d or 'simple'.


I had the label of problem child, and that put me through more torment... Even though the real "problem child"s were the kids tormenting me on a daily basis. My strategy of dealing with it just made it worse for myself. I would forget the specifics and just remember they had done things to me. So naturally when I cracked, and had the meltdowns that I kicked butt and got suspended for, I had no proof of what they had done to cause this (even though the principal was aware of the problems with these kids, but unable to do things because he had no proof of the kid's doings)... Needless to say, that kid was causing problems for a lot of people and getting away with it simply because there was not strong enough proof of the harm he was doing to kids, as it can't be viewed as bullying unless a kid comes forward with specific examples of what he is doing, so he got away with it at the school level. The one kid grew into a druggie that would have benefitted from some childhood intervention but never got it because the school was focusing on the real problem children: undiagnosed autistics, and others being bullied, who clearly needed discipline to behave properly...

Rant for the day... And I appologize for it being written so poorly.



ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

11 Mar 2009, 3:44 am

I really like what she has to say about the social construction of Autism:

Nadesan wrote:
Medical and scientific literatures represent autism as a biological fact that must be explained using the positivist methods and assumptions of the natural sciences. That is, the medical and scientific literatures often assume that autism is some "thing, or things", some essential biogenetic condition(s) which will ultimately be unequivocally identified and "known", as a spatially located genetic, neurological, or chemical abnormality through the efforts of scientists toiling in the laboratories.

Nadesan wrote:
Yet it has become increasingly clear to me that autism, or more specifically, the idea of autism, is fundamentally socially constructed. I use the phrase "socially constructed" to point to the social conditions necessary for the naming of autism as a disorder, and to the social conditions necessary for interpreting it, representing it, remediating it, and even performing it.

... because, yes, autism has a performative component, as known by every parent who struggled to meet the criteria for government and educational services for their child.

Nadesan wrote:
Ideas about autism reflect, and shape, societal norms and expectations and opportunities for personhood.


.



ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

11 Mar 2009, 5:14 am

ManErg wrote:
I support the idea that health, especially mental health, has a large amount of cultural influence on it. Although maybe that belief is just a symptom of my own flaws?

I agree, and I don't think it is just a "symptom of your own flaws".

I think that the mental health profession is, in the main, a large scale, institutionalised expression of people's/society's tendency to fear and reject difference which might be a threat to the "group"/those in power in the group.

When the group's success, or the success of those in power within the group, is based on behaviours x, y, z, anyone who does not perform, conform to, blindly agree with, those behaviours, is ostracised.

This used to be done physically, then by labelling people as inferior, but since the Mental Hygiene movement, as Nadesan says, the exclusion is achieved/justified by designating those individuals with behaviours which "don't fit" as dysfunctional, as suffering from disorders.

The concept/idea of autism, ( and the autism spectrum, which is so inclusive that it functions as a bogeyman; " you might be ... " ), works to defuse the tension created by people suffering from the way that society is organised, ( which enables/benefits some and disables others ).

The idea of autism allows society to say to people who are being excluded; "It's not your fault, you were born that way, but it is because you are dysfunctional that you have difficulty, not because society is currently favouring and enabling a different set of behaviours ".

.



ouinon
Supporting Member
Supporting Member

User avatar

Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Age: 61
Gender: Female
Posts: 5,939
Location: Europe

11 Mar 2009, 8:47 am

Woodpeace wrote:
The central importance given by the mental hygiene movement to personality development in children meant that the school system had a significant responsibility for this development. Cohen. S. 1983. The mental hygiene movement, the development of personality and the school: The medicalization of American education. History of Education Quarterly 23: pp. 123-149.).

This fits with what John Taylor Gatto writes about in his "Underground History of School", online at:
http://www.johntaylorgatto.com

He has looked at hundreds of documents both describing and contributing to the design /construction of school. In an excellent article on the real purposes of school, at:

http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/hp/frames.htm

Quote:
[One of the six fundamental functions is ] the "selective" function; to tag the "unfit", with poor grades, remedial placement, and other punishments, clearly enough that their peers will accept them as inferior and effectively bar them from the reproductive sweepstakes.


And there is a poem, written by a teenager a week before they committed suicide, called "He was Square inside, and Brown" at:

http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/undergro ... logue5.htm

( which is desperately sad ). And see the bit about the child diagnosed with ADHD below it, too.
.



Last edited by ouinon on 11 Mar 2009, 9:16 am, edited 1 time in total.