Is it creepy for older men to prefer younger women?

Post Reply New Topic

Well..at 53 i can vouch for that..as when i go dancing/walking.. my wife and i.. have to beat them off with a stick...

just kidding...

sort of....

But seriously..some women ..are looking for a little stability...

and obviously the hormones of an older ..guy.. well at least most of them..are
not locomotive express...

like mine used to be too...

i'm glad those days are over..too..SORT of...
now i do so many other things..

besides sex..(some form of stimulation that is)

it can take up too much time...in my opinion...

too much more interesting stuff to do in life..

than just that..but oh yah..it IS kool too...

and i would be seriously lying ..if i did not admit..

i still play around with it...

quite a bit....

i am even a free lance stripper now..

but that's another story...

totally...

i can usually do anything

i set my mind on...

to do...it

JUST DO IT..

AS NIKE SAY...

AND I JUST DID IT..

AS USUAL..:)

OH..AND HAVE A GREAT DAY!

YES..AND EVEN in my church..young women worship the flesh of an approximately 33 year old man..with nothing but something covering his private part.. doing an obviously very sensual yoga pose..as such..

presenting himself like this as a statue in front of the church..

And oh my GOD..!

i even have proof of it..

'RIGHT' here...

at this link:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/katiemiafr ... 038068326/

So when anyone gives me a problem about being a free lance

underwear model2..doing Yoga/TAI CHI poses and all of that..in my underwear...

i just direct them to that link!

and say see..i am in good company...

cannot you see..this...

(my friend) whoever i may be talking too....

and yah..if Jesus made it to 53..

he might be still doing that ..who knows..

maybe in Kashmir..

or some place like that...

TAI CHI/yOga..and all that eastern philosophy stuff..

that Buddhist leaning folks like Jesus..

might do to obtain..peace and bliss..

while all the babes just stare in amazement....

And say please Mr. please..

y not
me.....

OK THAT'S KINDA a joke..

but kinda not2...

as we ALL ARE JUST human animals2....

with all that horny stuff going on..

at least for most of them2....

http://www.youngerwomen4oldermen.com/

A dating website, specifically for the hot young blossoms who want to date geezers.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JX34cGcCd24[/youtube]

If there is a God, a big gator will eat that crazy ass wing nut.Let's pray on it.

I'm surprised anyone takes him seriously. It looks like an act to me, a parody of the outdoorsman.

Different people like different things. Just because you aren't sexually attracted to codgers doesn't mean that no-one is.

From an evolutionary perspective, current thinking seems to be that we're actually hardwired, and biologically adapted, for promiscuity:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZ_fHrCQOGY[/youtube]

Monogamy (on the part of females) may have come about as an adaptation to an agricultural lifestyle, where men came to identify women as property. A girl would be the property of her father, who, in some cultures, would accept a dowry in exchange for betrothing her. And, he would usually try to arrange for his daughters to be married to good men, who could support them. This remains the case in countries like Saudi Arabia, where marriages are arranged by the parents.

Romantic love is something of a new phenomenon.

Now, in countries influenced by the West, women are on their own to attract their own mates, whether for marriage or for casual coitus. They have to wiggle their tails, flirt, and display their merchandise a bit. In Saudi Arabia, no viewing of the merchandise whatsoever prior to the post-nuptial celebrations.

In our hunter-gatherer past, the identity of a child's father was of no relevance, as the children were raised communally, and no-one could get away with hoarding things for himself.

With agriculture, individual hoarding replaced collectivism. A man wanted legitimate offspring to whom to leave his accumulated wealth. Hence, his women became his sole property, and other men were barred from breeding with them.

Today, a lot of women are seeking to enjoy the primitive sex-in-the-city lifestyle, with group coitus, and now, with the miracle of birth control, may enjoy such activities without the primitive inconvenience of pregnancy.

And, some women still seek the protection and support that a wealthier (and probably older) man can provide.

Uh, yeah... probably 'chicks' your own age. Most women don't want men more than a decade younger than them, any more than they want men more than a decade older than them.

You know, it's great that polyamorous people aren't being seen as sexual deviants as much anymore, but they seem to have turned around and are now perpetuating the exact same claims on anyone that isn't like them as were once put on them: monogamists are the deviant, unnatural ones, who are just in denial of their own natures and who are deviating from our 'evolutionarily hardwired' way of being.

I'm naturally monogamous. Some women are; some men are. I wouldn't date a man who wasn't. Don't extrapolate from yourself onto everyone else, K?

Well, they'd be old hens by now.

The internet says that young women prefer old men: http://www.prweb.com/releases/KathrynMi ... 871700.htm

So, it must be true.

Well, this is a switch. The monogamous folks are becoming defensive.

Isn't this model more egalitarian/Feminist, and less Patriarchal, than the one proposed by Mr. Tallyman? Mr. Tallyman's model has women seeking to be sheltered and protected by a dominant man. The new model has people copulating all over the place, without regard to kierarchical constraints. In fact, there are no kierarchical constraints.

You wouldn't date a man who wasn't "naturally" monogamous?

From the video: ask the man: "When you masturbate, do you look at the same porn star each time?" I have never heard a man who did this. Which means that he is not "naturally" monogamous. He may be monogamous out of personal preference, cultural upbringing, pussywhipping, or whatnot.

I don't think masturbating counts, especially if someone doesn't have an actual partner.

@LKL: I'm not a young woman, so I wouldn't really know how they feel about it, to be completely honest. I'm also not trying to imply that it is or isn't creepy for men to be attracted to younger women, just that there's probably some evolutionary reason for men being attracted to younger women.

@TallyMan: I agree, despite the fact that it's been many thousands of years since we've been hunter-gatherers, human beings nowadays are still mostly hard-wired the same way they were back then. We still have the same drives and urges for the most part.

If our digestive systems have evolved since the advent of farming (and they have), why couldn't our brains have evolved somewhat as well?