Why Pope John Paul II did not get a Nobel Peace?

Page 3 of 3 [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

18 Apr 2014, 4:02 pm

GGPViper wrote:
... what I said.


Still irrelevant; compared to Latin-America, the Vatican has very little influence in Africa.

Quote:
Because of medical treatment. Antiretroviral drugs reduces the risk of transmitting HIV by up to 96 percent, and is instrumental in preventing mothers from passing on HIV to their children.
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6063/1628.full


Guess who sponsored the research of this--and freely distributes it in a lot of African countries.

Quote:
Quote:
... this was during John Paul II's reign (with the later Benedict doing the dirty work as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith).

... none of your statements were made by John Paul II, the subject of this thread. They refer to a book by Benedict XVI written in 2010.


If this thread is exclusively about John Paul II, then you shouldn't mention HIV. A significant number was already infected by the early 1950's, and by 1966, it had already gotten out of hand in many Sub-Saharan countries and spread to Haiti. John Paul II was elected pope in 1978.

Quote:
False. The most common transmission of HIV is through standard heterosexual intercourse (90 percent).


It doesn't matter if it's heterosexual or homosexual. Anal sex, regardless of gender, is 18 times more likely to pass on HIV than vaginal penetration. Your link about the Phillipines even mentioned something similar.

http://www.aidsmap.com/HIV-transmission ... e/1446187/

Quote:
Oh, so the Catholic Church backtracked from sabotaging sex education at the very last instant. How heart-warming. I hereby demote them from 100 percent ass-holes to 98 percent ass-holes. Satisfied?


The either did sabotage it or they did not sabotage it. According to your link, they did not.

Quote:
I'm pretty sure that they died anyway. If you judge people by their intended actions, not their actual actions, you get the Soviet Union.


Still irrelevant. HIV had gotten out of hand more than a decade after John Paul II became pope. The reason why we never heard anything of it in Europe until 1981, was that a series of Americans exposed to the virus in the late 1960s and early 1970s eventually died from it.

Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_control_in_Africa

Oh, dear. Guess which part of Africa has the highest Catholic percentage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_C ... try#Africa


That's post hoc ergo propter hoc reasoning.

[img][800:372]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/GDP_nominal_per_capita_world_map_IMF_2007.PNG[/img]

I rest my case regarding infrastructure. The country with the lowest contraceptive use is Chad, with roughly 20% of the country's members being catholics.


_________________
“He who controls the spice controls the universe.”


TheGoggles
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,060

19 Apr 2014, 8:16 am

naturalplastic wrote:

In that corner: One fanatic out to crucify the same man - for a crime he didnt commit!


Being an accomplice to the evasion of arrest for exploitation of a minor is a crime, and there's pretty much no way any of the two previous Popes didn't have some hand in making sure the allegations were covered up as much as possible.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 34,150
Location: temperate zone

19 Apr 2014, 8:34 am

Fair enough.

The fanatic in question didnt even think to charge him with that crime!



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 87
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

19 Apr 2014, 8:38 am

pawelk1986 wrote:
Why Pope John Paul II did not get a Nobel Peace Prize while, pastor Desmond Tutu and the Dalai Lama got?

I do not want to downplay the merits of the Dalai Lama and Pastor Desmond Tutu, but John Paul II has deserve it too, He helped peacefully dismantle the communist system in Eastern Europe.

Although the Dali Lama also fought and continue to fight against illegal annex his country Tibet by the PRC, and its forced secularisation. And pastor Desmond Tutu fought apartheid and racism in South Africa, but the Holy Father John Paul II also deserved the Nobel Peace Prize for his achievements, but the Nobel Prize is not awarded posthumously that's pity


JP-II did nothing about priests buggering altar boyx either.

ruveyn



GGPViper
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,880

19 Apr 2014, 9:57 am

John Paul was II alerted to the massive sexual abuse committed by Father Marcial Maciel in both 1978 (when he became pope) and in 1989, as one of his victims (Juan j. Vaca) provided detailed descriptions of the extent of the abuse which were forwarded to the Vatican. John Paul II did absolutely *nothing* to investigate these claims, and some even suggest that John Paul II prevented Ratzinger (the later Benedict XVI) from initiating investigations into these sex abuse allegations.

It is almost inconceivable that Ratzinger - given his rank within the Catholic Church - could be aware of sex abuse allegations (which he definitely was, even by his own admission) without John Paul II being aware of them as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_sca ... ial_Maciel
http://www.newsweek.com/father-marcial- ... ined-62811
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damia ... -cardinal/



pawelk1986
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Apr 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,899
Location: Wroclaw, Poland

20 Apr 2014, 9:35 am

GGPViper wrote:
John Paul was II alerted to the massive sexual abuse committed by Father Marcial Maciel in both 1978 (when he became pope) and in 1989, as one of his victims (Juan j. Vaca) provided detailed descriptions of the extent of the abuse which were forwarded to the Vatican. John Paul II did absolutely *nothing* to investigate these claims, and some even suggest that John Paul II prevented Ratzinger (the later Benedict XVI) from initiating investigations into these sex abuse allegations.

It is almost inconceivable that Ratzinger - given his rank within the Catholic Church - could be aware of sex abuse allegations (which he definitely was, even by his own admission) without John Paul II being aware of them as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_sca ... ial_Maciel
http://www.newsweek.com/father-marcial- ... ined-62811
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damia ... -cardinal/


I have read those links that you put here, and I am shocked at the Church should not be a place for those who harm children.
Pedophilia is a serious problem, but I can not believe that John Paul II for all he knew, maybe the Cardinals hiding the truth about how serious a problem and did not inform the Pope about it.



visagrunt
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Oct 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Vancouver, BC

20 Apr 2014, 10:13 am

There was already a Nobel Peace Prize awarded for the fall of communism in Poland: it went to Lech Wałęsa

There was already a Nobel Peace Prize awarded for the fall of communism, generally: it went to Mikhail Gorbachev

These two men did far more to bring down communism than the Pope ever did.

In one sense, John Paul II was a vicitm of his own election. Had he remained Archbishop of Cracow, he would have been as potent and influential a force for change in Poland as Desmond Tutu was in South Africa. But once he was safely ensconced in the Apostolic Palace there was no opportunity for him to be on the front lines of change.

Meanwhile, in the Vatican, he did little to stem the tide of corruption extending into the IOR. He presided over a vast conspiracy to remain quiet about clerical abuse of children. He perpetuated a dogma regarding contraception and abortion that endangered the lives of millions.


_________________
--James


Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

20 Apr 2014, 10:59 am

Gorbachev never intended to bring down communism. It fell as a result of the space race, the arms race, the Chernobyl disaster, the war in Afghanistan, rapidly declining oil and natural gas prices, and the fact that the Soviet economy (despite the natural resources in Russia) had almost no productivity whatsoever.

The Vatican didn't bring it down, but it made sure that it didn't gain foothold again in most of the puppet regimes of the USSR.


_________________
“He who controls the spice controls the universe.”


Last edited by Kurgan on 20 Apr 2014, 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Stannis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 19 Jan 2014
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,631

20 Apr 2014, 1:02 pm

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPDv_1peapY[/youtube]



TheGoggles
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,060

20 Apr 2014, 3:40 pm

pawelk1986 wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
TheValk wrote:
GGPViper wrote:
TheValk wrote:
How about you let each individual Christian denomination decide whether female ordination is religiously justified instead of blindly following whatever the hottest new trend of liberalism emerges?

Well, I have no problem with that. As long as those denominations stay the f*** out of politics, because then it is blatant gender discrimination.

What untermenschen do you consider them to be that they would be expected to opt out of politics?

Oh, I have no such expectation.

Bigots, apparently, are not known for their modesty... I find it particular illustrating that the Catholic Church - which does not allow female ordainment - has so adamant beliefs on the issues of abortion.

For instance: Wouldn't an organization with a mandated male-only leadership (The Catholic Church) be less competent to form an opinion on a topic which directly involves the female reproductive system compared to an organization with a more inclusive membership?

Why is it that organizations with the most limited female representation are the ones most vocal about what women should and should not do?


Because the murder of the unborn is a sin and women who have abortions just for your convenience, "Lets do some sex for fun, and eventually i can always get abortion on demand, i call such woman selfish b*****s. People undertaking the sexual act should take into account the possible consequences of their actions
I see abortion as an ordinary murder with premeditation, but I believe that abortion was the result of rape should be allowed. Although I would prefer instead, to the man who committed the rape was deprived of "tools" he used to commit the offense, of course, without anesthesia :D


You're pretty horrible! :D