Aspie1 wrote:
Love doesn't exist, at least not between romantic partners. Family members love each other, spouses love each other, humans and pets love each other, even friends love each other (although it's more like comfort and respect than love). But dating partners, no way! It's not love. It's just attraction. The man is attracted to the woman's ability to give him sex, her looks, and her being his guaranteed date for events that require one. The woman is attracted to the man's status/wealth, his ability to protect her, and to the romance he provides (flowers, moonlit walks, etc.). Simply put, the attraction is toward something each person cannot give themselves. A woman will look awkward having a moonlit walk alone, not to mention putting herself in danger. And for a man, masturbating with one's right hand stops being enjoyable very quickly.
Simply put, the item offered by each party cannot be enjoyed without an opposite-sex partner. (I know nothing about same-sex dynamics, so I won't speak on that.) So both parties enter into an unwritten agreement of sorts: each one will give the other what they can give (romance or sex), and collect from the other what they want (sex or romance). It's a rational, albeit somewhat unfair exchange, since providing sex is free, but providing romance is costly. But the system is there, and it works, despite being unfavorable to aspie men. Still, whatever it is, it's certainly not love.
How can romantic partners not be in love but spouses can. Do couples magically fall in love udring their wedding? I don't see your logic there.
Also, although some people (of both sexes) often use a relationship to their own means, I don't think its true with ALL couples. Saying men only want sex and looks and women only want romance and money...is it still sexist when both sexes are equally degraded?