Is Aspie A Political \ Advocacy Party?

Post Reply New Topic

It is confusing because some tell me of the Aspie perspective but I am not sure if they consulted the other aspies. Is aspie part of the Asperger's pride movement?

The only ASD lobby group I'm aware of is the ASAN. Quite frankly, I find the idea of most other groups getting politically active and drawing attention disturbing because they are such a liability.

Major reason why I don't join nothing and even social advocacy groups in official capacity but in personal capacity I simply have extreme focuses on my professional capacity. Best I can do is neutralization activism. Other then that I don't much bother with anything but make smelly things with others and speak motivationally and try new not so controversial ideas with the public.

im 100% certain what i meant by is aspie a political viewpoint.if what is meant is,is there a dominent aspie viewpoint i would say no.i dont think there is a aspie view point a lot more people are like me out there who viewpoints dont fall into the cliche's.

How can a self-indentifying name be a political party?

I wouldn't consider it a party Mr. G. I'd consider it individuals exposed to common political themes and whom at times it would seem come up with collective mutual opinions in larger groups. It's essentially an activism theme relating to identity. As it is related to an identity having to do with a disorder the similarity of having it relating to a disorder and ones identity thus central self-image certain topics are more on average interpreted certain ways because of the relation to identity focus. Some but could call it a political cult but I don't think it is that intense of a belief system but it can be mind altering in the sense issues are learned to be taken personally when comparability other disability issues in other kinds of groups are not for other people and without the social identity in relations to disorder simplex manifest.

Deceptively complex?

It was made clear as in quite simple and not that complicated. The aspie is not a political party but a self-identity with a disorder label activism theme. Everyone is entitled to their own views, personal liberties and self-definitions. It's just when anyone tried to evade treatment rights for others while enticing their views of the dignity of a disorder label be followed or else it cannot be progressed is where the conflict is. 100,000,000 calling themselves aspies could attempt to evade one persons with autism views that autism is a disability that he or she seeks a cure for and not one or them all could evade that persons liberties. My suggestion is to respect the dignity of individuals who are disabled that want treatment advancements and whom see the label just as the impairments and not the entire mind and it's personality while seeking to wreak havoc on anothers treatment liberties. It just won't work unless you enact socialism or the some of them as in the leaders finally get paid off like they want. Personally I wouldnt accept any pay off to speak against treatment advancement rights as it is a sacred and fundamental American liberty in idea.

That's what I meant by deceptively complex. Deceptively complex means it seems complex when it isn't. It just means the same thing as you already said but in a way that is ingrained in to how the english language already work.

In social settings of a myriad of different people it is complicated. First I look at the macro projections then view the conflict and potential indirect causation to rights as an example.

So what's with the title?

Grabbing your attention and creating conversion.

That seems a bit silly. I don't think, for example, that someone is actually able to misrepresent themselves at all socially. Think of all the chaos it could lead to? The first thing I could think of is nationalist sentiments, like how groups of people claim 'we are the best'.

I am not sure why you say this.

Yeah but just believing you're an aspie or something doesn't actually mean you hate people who want to cure themselves or something.

With peer pressure of a certain way deriving obviously the non-respect toward certain individuals I figure a little peer pressure in the other direction to gain proper respect for others individual choices is simple social justice.

One should also respect the dignity of people who don't. Claiming that ASAN is self-centered in one of your posts without actually giving evidence of why they are doesn't seem to show that you are doing that.

ASAN is very much about a particular view while confronting others views whom they personally choose not to like. They hate the word cure, they use abortion in protests to make demands for money and when doing so jeopardize the welfare of others over their frantic one sided beliefs. I will only admit that an extreme might be to preoccupies with it's concerns to reflect upon just how self-centered their approaches are that risk others for the sake of a little respect.

I want you to actually say why and how these people are paying off any one. I want proof.

Prove this statement wrong. Did ASAN or did they not guilt the public about autism abortion politics while making demands for support services for what seemed like very high functioning people in the protest videos? They indeed would like to receive compensation while actively in the same context accusing the American public of human cleansing in potential while their supporters online accuse my country which my father serves and I grew up in a military family of being like Nazi's and people dressed as Jewish people protest as well? All very coincidental and cannot be linked from online to offline becuase they know how to play their political games right and if anyone believes it for sure they will just be considered autism bigots but those ASAN folks are the worse kinds of public relations campaigners and advocates I've ever come across and I want them no where near me, the public to know they don't speak for me and they can ship their own arses to some desert Oasis if they don't like it.