Hi Swbluto,
For a while (still???), the Asperger's Syndrome was going to be defined completely away in the DSM-V, while the "user's manuals" with the DSM-IV has already "kicked" the statistical distributions of IQ against populations with a vast expansion of determinatively included IQ ranges as an inclusive element in the DSM manuals, but not the DSM Bible itself per se (the DSM "experts" calling shyness an illness doesn't make shyness an illness, except only to true-believers who overly trust the "experts" with their DSM Bible). The DSM user manuals that have IQ-cutoffs for Aspergers also use a rather arbitrary point for the lowest IQ for the applied label "Aspergers", while the distributions were DSM weighted away from criteria giving the greatest frequency to higher IQs.
Maybe Time magazine's usage of the word "Aspergery" clarifies more simply with what I'm critical of with the DSM corrupting the statistical distribution of Asperger's and IQ:
http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101020 ... rgers.htmlWhile I'm also critical of IQ tests, your quoting what Callista wrote of "Not only does IQ not equal intelligence, but IQ isn't even elevated in Aspies", reminds me of a claim that yardsticks do not measure length, not even if the person measuring the length with a yardstick has Asperger's. Then, there's all the balderdash between "Intellectual Intelligence" versus "Emotional Intelligence", which might mean that dogs have more intelligence than humans do.
After graduating university magna cum laude with a bachelor's degree in science, my high IQ was exploited by federal employers to deny me employment (google "Too Smart To Be A Cop" for similar examples of employers not wanting smart employees "who might become bored" as an excuse for discrimination at the high IQ end of the spectrum, and
http://www.ctb.uscourts.gov/SelOpinDoc/ ... 0Draft.pdf for a low IQ end of the spectrum example). In grade school, a few of my teachers attempted to have me classified as Mentally ret*d (students must have the social skills to hide their being smarter than their teachers).
Successfully masking intelligence requires great social skills too, as many advanced tests have scales to catch people "faking stupid" (generally, faking causes too big of a decrease in measured IQ, or wide fluctuations with different testings), much like the scales developed with the MMPI to catch people "faking bad" (FBS).
Have you watched the bad movie "Idiocracy" (2006)???
you're serious? people will retaliate in that fashion as your teachers did? or are you exaggerating?