How come people with Aspergers can't work ?

Page 15 of 16 [ 243 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16  Next

1000Knives
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2011
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,036
Location: CT, USA

14 Jul 2012, 8:48 pm

Verdandi wrote:
1000Knives wrote:
There is a difference between should and reality.


The bolded part of my post that he quoted is a link to a thread that talks about impairments in intelligent autistic people. His assertion that being able to write well and being intelligent should reflect greater ability to work is simply not factual.


What I mean is, for example, there should be no traffic accidents, I mean there's lights controlling the traffic. Then why do so many people die every year from them?



XFilesGeek
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Jul 2010
Age: 40
Gender: Non-binary
Posts: 6,031
Location: The Oort Cloud

14 Jul 2012, 8:56 pm

So far, my ability to talk and write well have only made me less employable.

Being articulate means squat without a verbal filter.


_________________
"If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced."

-XFG (no longer a moderator)


Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

14 Jul 2012, 9:10 pm

CyborgUprising wrote:
Something that isn't controversial is complaining about people receiving benefits, (you neglected to add what I said in my original statement: people receiving benefits who are not disabled...Cherry-picking again, I see)


I am not cherry picking, but referring to your initial post on this thread, in which you agreed with cavendish 100% for saying "I am not saying that people with Aspergers don't have some problems, but why can't they get out there and work?" You Also offered your litmus test for yourself at least, when you stated that because your grandfather was injured in WWII but "never whined about not being able to do something" that you have no right to, I assume, complain. Also that there are people with far more problems than you working, therefore you have no right to be anything less than self-supporting. You offered a disclaimer at the end that some people with ASDs cannot work, but your actual statement is that "Disability is for those who are too disabled to work, not for those who can work, but choose to use the label of a minor disability."

You are not actually complaining about people receiving benefits who are not disabled. You offer two examples of people with actual disabilities who worked (yourself and your grandfather), and your complaint is about people whom you deem to be insufficiently disabled. Since there is no reason to assume that you can be objective about this, and because you are agreeing 100% with someone who spends a lot of time browbeating others who consider work very difficult or impossible, then why should I assume that your dog whistle about people who are "really disabled enough to work" is actually meaningful?

Quote:
When one says that people should be more willing to work while not understanding the circumstances said people may be living with, then one is aligning themselves with fairly conventional right wing talking points. I know this individual's situation, thank you very much. Saying I aligned myself with Conservatives, interesting... I am non-partisan. Get it through your head. Also, where did I say "people should be more willing to work?" I said a particular individual (who I know quite well) should not be (illegally) receiving disability benefits.


I said you aligned yourself with fairly conventional right wing talking points. I didn't say you aligned yourself with Conservatives, I was much more specific than that. Still, it's true, your comments in this thread are fairly conservative. You say you're a non-partisan, and I take that at face value, but I have come across quite a few non-partisans (which refers to political party, not political spectrum) and a lot of democrats who hold fairly conservative views even if their outlook is overall liberal.

Also, the person with whom you agree with 100% is the one who said that people should be more willing to work, often addressing specific people who have stated that they have difficulties with working. Which individual are you talking about that you know their situation and thus can judge better than their doctors, therapists, psychologists, psychiatrists, etc. whether they really work or not?

Quote:
Don't be melodramatic. No one's called you evil, no one's called you a liar. I pointed out you were agreeing with bullying behavior. Your statements are not radical, unpopular, or controversial (they are among certain groups, including Conservatives and the religious fundamentalists), You may not be conservative yourself, but you agreed with some very popular conservative talking points.
There you are, claiming I said you called me evil. I said you can call me evil all you want. I did not say you called me evil. Where are you getting that from? You say I am be[ing] melodramatic; I am certainly not. Telling someone that the things they say are untrue is equivalent to calling them a liar.


The statements you made in this thread about employment and disability would not be radical at all among conservatives and religious fundamentalists, unless they have a realistic perspective about disability and ability to work (I know one such conservative, who is a good friend). You can certainly hold other views that are unconventional and radical, and I made no statement about such possible other views.

You are being melodramatic. You introduced the word "evil" to the discussion, and I did not claim you said that I called you evil. I said "No one's called you evil." Bringing the word into the discussion without anyone having said anything of the sort is melodramatic.

Telling someone that the things they say are untrue is not the equivalent of calling them a liar. They may be deliberately stating untrue things, they may be stating things they believe are true, but actually are not. In the latter case, pointing out what they said is untrue is not calling them a liar. If you feel that I am accusing you of lying, that's more about you than it is about me, but I don't personally think you're lying.

I find it fascinating that you constantly accuse me of cherry picking, but take a few quotes out of several posts and twist my wording into things I never said (like claiming that I said you called me evil when all I said was "no one called you evil"). I guess I can see why you get into flame wars whenever you discuss this topic. You react very poorly to disagreement.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

14 Jul 2012, 9:11 pm

1000Knives wrote:
Verdandi wrote:
1000Knives wrote:
There is a difference between should and reality.


The bolded part of my post that he quoted is a link to a thread that talks about impairments in intelligent autistic people. His assertion that being able to write well and being intelligent should reflect greater ability to work is simply not factual.


What I mean is, for example, there should be no traffic accidents, I mean there's lights controlling the traffic. Then why do so many people die every year from them?


That's a good point.

I didn't think you thought he was telling the truth, I was agreeing with you and just kvetching a bit that he ignores factual information in favor of his theories and shoulds and such.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

14 Jul 2012, 9:13 pm

XFilesGeek wrote:
So far, my ability to talk and write well have only made me less employable.

Being articulate means squat without a verbal filter.


Exactly. When I can only speak succintly if I've scripted what I need to say in advance, and when I do not things happen such as my explanation that I am not immediately in danger of killing myself nearly gets me hospitalized as a suicide risk, I am not sure that "articulate" quite means what cavendish wants it to mean.



viv
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 54
Location: South Korea

14 Jul 2012, 9:20 pm

Rascal77s wrote:
viv wrote:
Lots of Aspies have very good reasons why they can't work. Lately I've been trying to figure out some Aspies being unable to find employment. It seems like a contradiction because in some ways Aspie traits do make for good employees. While I was researching I ran into something interesting. When looking at employment rates - Hispanic men are actually the most employed population in the US as of 2009:

Hispanic men have 73.7% employment rate (68.7 for white men and 54.43 for black men)

This was interesting to me because it was contrary to what I expected, I thought lower education rates and racial discrimination would serve as barriers to employment.

I found some explanations - for example, jobs that rationally employ Hispanics are doing better in the recovery. But the question still remained why aren’t more educated and less racially disadvantaged white men replacing Hispanic men in these areas?

Then I found it, despite having the highest employment rate, Hispanic men also have a high unemployment rate 11% compared to 6.4% for whites. So why did the highest employed population also have such a high unemployment rate? The reason is unemployment only counts people actually looking for work - it leaves out everyone who has given up or just dropped out of the job market. so it seems likely that they are more likely than the general population to actively and persistently look for jobs, while many others will give up after extended periods of unemployment and many rejections.

The only thing I can't explain are the black men who have the highest unemployment rates (so are the most actively looking for a job) but also the lowest employment rates. This must be related to other factors.

So maybe Aspies are like Latinos - if we actively and persistently look for jobs, even after many rejections, and are willing to accept unpleasant jobs, like the Latinos, maybe we too will have good employment rates.

On the other hand, maybe Aspies are like black men - who just can't seem to catch a break no matter how hard they try.

I don't know, but without the information available, it seems good for those who want jobs to mimic Latinos - keep actively and persistently trying even when the odds are stacked against you.


Look at the unemployment, poverty, and education rates for Native Americans. It makes me sad and angry how marginalized and neglected they are in the US and Canada.


That's a population that is really suffering alot - but (speaking only for Canada because I don't know the situation in the U.S.) I think much of that has to do with the enormous, government interference in the lives of Native Americans, that was at the best paternalistc and the wost malicious, which occured through very recent history and continues even to this day. I can't find stats. attesting to this (reliable stats. for Canada are hard to find) but I have heard stories that once a Native leaves a reserve they are generally happier and have a better time finding a job.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

14 Jul 2012, 9:27 pm

viv wrote:
That's a population that is really suffering alot - but (speaking only for Canada because I don't know the situation in the U.S.) I think much of that has to do with the enormous, government interference in the lives of Native Americans, that was at the best paternalistc and the wost malicious, which occured through very recent history and continues even to this day. I can't find stats. attesting to this (reliable stats. for Canada are hard to find) but I have heard stories that once a Native leaves a reserve they are generally happier and have a better time finding a job.


I think that in the US there are similar difficulties, even if the form the government interference takes is different.



Wandering_Stranger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,261

15 Jul 2012, 4:33 am

Cavendish - your ignorance really is shocking. As mentioned before, many can't work due to the ignorance of others. I am one such person. Someone (who isn't medically trained; nor is she aware what my psychiatrist and I discussed) once decided that my Autism can't be that bad. She's spent a total of about 4 hours with me this year.

Quote:
since there should be much better support and career placement services available.


But there isn't. And that's the problem. There is no support at all. I've tried getting some support; but there is no, apparently.



viv
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jun 2012
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 54
Location: South Korea

15 Jul 2012, 5:20 am

Wandering_Stranger wrote:
Cavendish - your ignorance really is shocking. As mentioned before, many can't work due to the ignorance of others. I am one such person. Someone (who isn't medically trained; nor is she aware what my psychiatrist and I discussed) once decided that my Autism can't be that bad. She's spent a total of about 4 hours with me this year.

Quote:
since there should be much better support and career placement services available.


But there isn't. And that's the problem. There is no support at all. I've tried getting some support; but there is no, apparently.


I'm curious about this - what kind of support do you think would be benefical to help Autistics finding a job? Interview help, AS friendly job placement agencies? What sort of help do you think Austicis need and is most lacking?



Wandering_Stranger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,261

15 Jul 2012, 5:25 am

I obviously can't speak for everyone else, but:
For me, it's things like interview skills and AS friendly jobs.



Verdandi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Dec 2010
Age: 54
Gender: Female
Posts: 12,275
Location: University of California Sunnydale (fictional location - Real location Olympia, WA)

15 Jul 2012, 5:38 am

In the US, Vocational Rehabilitation is supposed to help with that, but I am not sure how effective it is. I know that learning how to interview may not actually overcome autistic weaknesses in such a situation. I've taken classes on how to interview for work, but I never get hired on the basis of an interview. The closest I ever came was a fairly unconventional interview in a fairly unconventional workplace, and much of the interview was about how to use google to find anything and everything.



hanyo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2011
Age: 49
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,302

15 Jul 2012, 5:49 am

Two serious problems that I'd have with interviews are social anxiety and that I won't lie in them. Actually I'm so shy I don't even know if I could ask for an application. When my toilet was broken I wouldn't even ask for the bathroom key in the fast food place I went to. I just left and kept looking for an unlocked bathroon.

Not that it matters since I only got a chance to do one interview in my life. The two jobs I actually had I didn't have to interview for.



Last edited by hanyo on 15 Jul 2012, 6:32 am, edited 1 time in total.

Wandering_Stranger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,261

15 Jul 2012, 6:28 am

Verdandi wrote:
In the US, Vocational Rehabilitation is supposed to help with that, but I am not sure how effective it is. I know that learning how to interview may not actually overcome autistic weaknesses in such a situation. I've taken classes on how to interview for work, but I never get hired on the basis of an interview. The closest I ever came was a fairly unconventional interview in a fairly unconventional workplace, and much of the interview was about how to use google to find anything and everything.


I don't think we have anything like this. I've had 2 interviews for jobs. One was a face-to-face interview and the other was a group based interview. I've also done computer based assessments and got a job that way. Unfortunately, that was only as a Christmas temp. As boring as that job was, it was perfect for me.



Dillogic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,339

15 Jul 2012, 6:33 am

One thing I find odd:

What is up with people talking about veterans of war being so super duper tough, who if suffer from PTSD and/or have wounds, they then can't work? How is that any worst than being born with deficits that are equal or worst than? Wouldn't someone having to experience this their whole life be more deserving of veneration?

It's not like you can't get PTSD and/or physical wounds from other things (not to mention that PTSD is generally treatable and far less severe than ASDs).



Wandering_Stranger
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 35
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,261

15 Jul 2012, 6:35 am

Dillogic wrote:
One thing I find odd:

What is up with people talking about veterans of war being so super duper tough, who if suffer from PTSD and/or have wounds, they then can't work? How is that any worst than being born with deficits that are equal or worst than? Wouldn't someone having to experience this their whole life be more deserving of veneration?

It's not like you can't get PTSD and/or physical wounds from other things (not to mention that PTSD is generally treatable and far less severe than ASDs).


I've noticed this a lot. (not on here specifically) It seems that if you're a war veteran, you're a hero and the rest of us are scroungers.



Dillogic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Nov 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,339

15 Jul 2012, 6:50 am

It's sad.

You get ostracized by many due to disability you were born with (not trying hard enough, lazy, leech, and all of that), and you get people saying it's your fault that you can't work.

It's hilariously sad.

Getting out of bed is a battle each day for me, and everything I do is hard; nothing is easy.