Page 1 of 5 [ 65 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

aghogday
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Nov 2010
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,596

14 Sep 2014, 10:14 am

@Tallyman

Personally I don't believe it should be in there, even though my faith in GOD is unwavering; simply as one definition of GOD is often pushed over another, and it can lead to some folks feeling excluded and unincorporated in the spirit of camaraderie that can be a life or death situation, in real effect in the military, as morale is key to survival in life or death combat scenarios.

And although a belief in God is not necessarily a literal belief in a religion per separation of church and state, I think that is splitting hairs as in the US per the dominance of traditional Christianity here from everything from Christmas to the frigging Duck Dynasty, if you will.

And yes, I do support Atheist rights as seeing that as religion as in reality it obviously is. It's almost impossible for a person to state an atheist belief where I live, as there is a Christian Church on almost every street corner.

And it also is as impossible for a person to state they are homosexual whether it be in the church pews or at work with that overwhelming demographic. So people usually don't come out of the closet, if you will, just for the sake of continuing to gain subsistence through work, unless they are lucky enough to work for the government and be protected by escaping our laws of firing folks for any reason in the state of Florida, outside of unionized and government work.

However, my opinion is certainly in the minority, and one of idealism now vs. reality as it applies to general human nature, specific to where I live.

The opposite, majority rational side of the argument, is human beings as social animals who think abstractly with complex abstract language use common symbols whether it be words or edifice of structures to bond, simply bond.

The word GOD is such a symbol, and yes considering 98 percent of the world at least believes in the possibility of some kind of GOD, it would be irrational for me to ever think that my ideal could be effected in a large country like the USA, where somewhere around 80 percent of the country still professes not only a theist belief but a traditional Christian one too.

I don't particularly care for traditional Christianity as I can discern the symbolic nature of more ancient texts, but never the less there too, per the reality of statistics; I know that most people cannot and that number seems to be growing lower as well, for the general population who cannot make it much further than a 'twitter verse' without being distracted to move on to the next bite size measure of infotainment.

Now granted this may be different where you live, as your culture does not place the same importance on the symbolic word of GOD as a common bonding tool there, and certainly not Christianity, but cultures are different, so what works in yours, will simply not work in mine, per the science of human nature at this point in time, and as it has existed for thousands and thousands of years.

The only way it will change is if the US suddenly becomes a more homogenous country with a much stronger welfare state extended out into the smallest of rural areas.

In my opinion, that is beyond the case for rationality and logic, as things stand now and even in the distant future.

It's just math; the statistics currently suggest it cannot happen no matter what idealistic notions I may have, as maverick instead of a 'part of the heard of herd'.

And yes, the old religious text repeated in many other metaphorical ways in other philosophies since ancient times of "change the things you can and accept the things you cannot", does apply as part of the rational decision making process.

Folks who want to join the military, logically and realistically will have to suck it up and say the words, if they do not agree with the principle behind it, or idealistically, stand their ground and pursue another career.

It's kind of silly in my mind to place such importance on abstract concepts to rule one's life. Some folks do think rigidly like that, but no, I do not do that anymore. I realize there is always more to the human story than meets my eyes, if I do a little more research, and allow myself to have an open mind.

I go to the Catholic church for human connection with people I have known for decades as I know science shows that is integral to human happiness, and 'by GOD of Nature', that part of it 'dam' sure works.

When they come to the part of the creed that says Jesus is some kind of King of the Universe, I quite my voice whether people like it or not. It's hard enough these days to keep the building fund going, and no, not likely anyone is going to argue it with a 230LB, rather imposing looking guy who is already known to dance a martial arts style in every store in the metro area.

Now to be clear, I am not promoting myself here. But it does make an example that per what we think our problems are in life, often are due to the fact that we do not exercise the freedoms we already have as US citizens, and even as human beings per human nature, here where I live. I go my own way, as my country allows it and protects that right, to an astounding degree now, if one just takes all of their rights and utilizes them as strong individuals, yes literally training themselves to be as strong as they can too, as that is an important part of human nature to be strong, fearless, and free, not unlike any other social animal in any other group.

That is truly the spirit of freedom; giving and taking, is what it takes to truly be free. But if a person does not exercise it within their human nature by becoming as strong as they can and exercising their legal rights, it's truly no one's fault but their own.

I am no victim, I am a victor, as I follow the laws of nature, not silly idealistic ways of culture, including my own, at times as stated above. :)

Knowing who other people are is ?just? as important as knowing who I am. But that is also basic social animal nature; the similar too, for thousands of years that is also losing traction from illusory ways of thinking, against the nature of human being living, in the culture we have in the US now.

Yes, it can be extremely hard to see it is, unless one finds a way to escape culture, like I did through losing effective use of my sight and hearing for years. Kind of a harsh way to do it, and not my choice, but never the less it worked very well for me.


_________________
KATiE MiA FredericK!iI

Gravatar is one of the coolest things ever!! !

http://en.gravatar.com/katiemiafrederick


Last edited by aghogday on 14 Sep 2014, 9:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

14 Sep 2014, 10:22 am

luanqibazao wrote:
Way back in the late Mesozoic I was allowed to omit those words, and I did omit them. But if that weren't an option I think I would have joined anyway. They're just meaningless sounds to me, and it's not as if I were being forced to go to church or lead the unit in prayer.


I could not in all conscience say those words; even if they were required of me because it would cheapen the affirmation if I deliberately lied just to be unnoticed. Similarly I wouldn't be able to swear on a bible in a court of law as it would again be a lie. (I don't know if courts in some parts of the world still do that or not; I've never been to court, just seen it done on TV) If something is supposed to be a sincere and solemn oath / affirmation it makes it into a nonsense if you have to pretend to accept it. People might just as well say "Hubble, bubble, butterflies and bollocks" for all the affirmation / oath becomes worth.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

14 Sep 2014, 10:26 am

TallyMan wrote:
I could not in all conscience say those words; even if they were required of me because it would cheapen the affirmation if I deliberately lied just to be unnoticed. Similarly I wouldn't be able to swear on a bible in a court of law as it would again be a lie. (I don't know if courts in some parts of the world still do that or not; I've never been to court, just seen it done on TV) If something is supposed to be a sincere and solemn oath / affirmation it makes it into a nonsense if you have to pretend to accept it. People might just as well say "Hubble, bubble, butterflies and bollocks" for all the affirmation / oath becomes worth.

Exactly. In other words: "But above all things, my brethren, swear not, neither by heaven, neither by the earth, neither by any other oath: but let your yea be yea; and your nay, nay..." --James 5:12.


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

14 Sep 2014, 10:54 am

Raptor wrote:
Raptor wrote:
1. I dont remember being asked if I was an atheist
2. "So help me God" is in the oath but so what? It's not going to keep any atheist from taking the oath unless said atheists really don't want to join and are just using that as an excuse.....


trollcatman wrote:
Or maybe they don't want to swear an oath on something they don't believe in.

What it is is four (4) words at the end of the oath typically taken en masse that they are only repeating after someone. It's more of a formality than anything and is in no way a confirmation of any religion.

Quote:
If the atheist in question wouldn't want to join, why are they even there?

- Being pressured into it by parents that are tired of housing their over 18 kid while they arent doing anything constructive. It happens often enough to be counted.
- Going through the motions to "prove" they want to join up but use the "So help me God" part of the oath as a cop-out saying it goes against their "principles".

I know someone that went through the motions and flunked the ASVAB by getting such a low score that no branch would take him for ANY purpose. How do I know he flunked it on purpose? I don't know for a fact, but I've known him long enough to know he's too smart in every way to get such a sh***y score. That's just one story.

I can see this transitioning into another need for totally zero tolerance sec-u-lar government thread.


trollcatman wrote:
So you are saying having an oath that could be used as an excuse is good for filtering out the flakey people?
Duh, wut? How did you arrive at that? If people elect to use the "so help me God" part of the oath as an excuse that's hardly a tool for "filtering out the flaky people". If someone elects to kill themselves by ramming a retaining wall on the highway that hardly makes the retaining wall a killing device.

Quote:
That may be fine, but there are genuine atheists who feel they are being disingenuous by saying those words.
I doubt that 15 minutes after they took the oath they actually remember what all the words were, including the "so help me God" part. For someone entering the armed forces, by the time they get to the oath they're starting to have bigger things on their minds.
Trust me....
Image

Quote:
It may not be a big deal to many people but it's also not a big deal to change the words, or have a secular version of the oath as an option.

"Change this, change that, or the sky will fall." Every time someone decides to feel butthurt over something we can't just change it.
Again, the oath is a formality. What keeps people in the military on the straight and narrow is either their pre-existing values or a fear of a court martial or an article 15, not the oath.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

14 Sep 2014, 11:19 am

Raptor wrote:
Again, the oath is a formality. What keeps people in the military on the straight and narrow is either their pre-existing values or a fear of a court martial or an article 15, not the oath.


Then drop the oath completely, as it is apparently irrelevant.


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

14 Sep 2014, 11:31 am

TallyMan wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Again, the oath is a formality. What keeps people in the military on the straight and narrow is either their pre-existing values or a fear of a court martial or an article 15, not the oath.


Then drop the oath completely, as is apparently irrelevant.

The US military is big on tradition and formalities. Dropping the oath is in the distant future if at all. Right now my money is on the oath staying.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

14 Sep 2014, 11:34 am

Raptor wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Again, the oath is a formality. What keeps people in the military on the straight and narrow is either their pre-existing values or a fear of a court martial or an article 15, not the oath.


Then drop the oath completely, as is apparently irrelevant.

The US military is big on tradition and formalities. Dropping the oath is in the distant future if at all. Right now my money is on the oath staying.


So it is better to make atheists into liars and deceivers from the word go by stating an oath they don't acknowledge or accept? Way to go! :lol:


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


LoveNotHate
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Oct 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,195
Location: USA

14 Sep 2014, 11:37 am

Raptor wrote:
I doubt that 15 minutes after they took the oath they actually remember what all the words were, including the "so help me God" part. For someone entering the armed forces, by the time they get to the oath they're starting to have bigger things on their minds.


Yes, and later non-religious people may "find religion" in the military, because they can get religious time off to attend religious activities. As far as I know, non-religious are not offered corresponding time off.

[rhetorical question] So, does one want to "chill out" worshiping a GOD, or do some likely hard manual labor ?



AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

14 Sep 2014, 11:38 am

TallyMan wrote:
So it is better to make atheists into liars and deceivers from the word go by stating an oath they don't acknowledge or accept...?

Well, those joining the U.S. military are working for the federal government, so, yeah! Hehe.


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

14 Sep 2014, 11:57 am

LoveNotHate wrote:
Raptor wrote:
I doubt that 15 minutes after they took the oath they actually remember what all the words were, including the "so help me God" part. For someone entering the armed forces, by the time they get to the oath they're starting to have bigger things on their minds.


Yes, and later non-religious people may "find religion" in the military, because they can get religious time off to attend religious activities. As far as I know, non-religious are not offered corresponding time off.

[rhetorical question] So, does one want to "chill out" worshiping a GOD, or do some likely hard manual labor ?


Was that your experience? Please enlightn us, for this is something I've not heard of.


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

14 Sep 2014, 12:00 pm

TallyMan wrote:
Raptor wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Again, the oath is a formality. What keeps people in the military on the straight and narrow is either their pre-existing values or a fear of a court martial or an article 15, not the oath.


Then drop the oath completely, as is apparently irrelevant.

The US military is big on tradition and formalities. Dropping the oath is in the distant future if at all. Right now my money is on the oath staying.


So it is better to make atheists into liars and deceivers from the word go by stating an oath they don't acknowledge or accept? Way to go! :lol:

You're reading way too much into it.....


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


TallyMan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 40,061

14 Sep 2014, 12:04 pm

Raptor wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
Raptor wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Again, the oath is a formality. What keeps people in the military on the straight and narrow is either their pre-existing values or a fear of a court martial or an article 15, not the oath.


Then drop the oath completely, as is apparently irrelevant.

The US military is big on tradition and formalities. Dropping the oath is in the distant future if at all. Right now my money is on the oath staying.


So it is better to make atheists into liars and deceivers from the word go by stating an oath they don't acknowledge or accept? Way to go! :lol:

You're reading way too much into it.....


Out of curiosity, what would happen to atheists who didn't say the final part of the oath and the sergeant major or whoever was there noticed their silence? Would it be ignored as a trivial irrelevancy?


_________________
I've left WP indefinitely.


AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

14 Sep 2014, 12:16 pm

TallyMan wrote:
Out of curiosity, what would happen to atheists who didn't say the final part of the oath and the sergeant major or whoever was there noticed their silence? Would it be ignored as a trivial irrelevancy?

Administratively (as far as "you're in the Army now"), of course; punitively (as far as "you didn't obey my order"), not a whit!


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

14 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm

TallyMan wrote:
Raptor wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
Raptor wrote:
TallyMan wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Again, the oath is a formality. What keeps people in the military on the straight and narrow is either their pre-existing values or a fear of a court martial or an article 15, not the oath.


Then drop the oath completely, as is apparently irrelevant.

The US military is big on tradition and formalities. Dropping the oath is in the distant future if at all. Right now my money is on the oath staying.


So it is better to make atheists into liars and deceivers from the word go by stating an oath they don't acknowledge or accept? Way to go! :lol:

You're reading way too much into it.....


Out of curiosity, what would happen to atheists who didn't say the final part of the oath and the sergeant major or whoever was there noticed their silence? Would it be ignored as a trivial irrelevancy?


1. I'd have to look it up but I believe the oath has to be administered by a commissioned officer, not a non-commissioned officer.
2. Would it be ignored? It would depend on who the noticer is and probably what the recruitment number goals are.
I'm inclined to say that it would more likely (intentionally) go unnoticed if the oath were administered en masse. It can be more of a hassle to make an issue out of some things than to just pretend it didnt happen, depending.....


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


Spectacles
Pileated woodpecker
Pileated woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2014
Gender: Male
Posts: 175
Location: Va

14 Sep 2014, 12:38 pm

Would atheists be allowed to be conscientious objectors, given the opportunity to do so ever arose?



AspieUtah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jun 2014
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,118
Location: Brigham City, Utah

14 Sep 2014, 12:44 pm

Spectacles wrote:
Are atheists allowed to be conscientious objectors?

Yep. In the Wikipedia.org article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscript ... _objection "Conscription in the United States," at least two U.S. Supreme Court opinions defined the ability of atheists to seek and be granted conscientious objector status (which simply means that they would be conscripted, just not for combat duty). During the Vietnam war, most were assigned to medic duty putting them in harms way, but not armed.

Wikipedia.org wrote:
The Supreme Court has ruled in cases United States v. Seeger (1965) and Welsh v. United States (1970) that conscientious objection can be by non-religious beliefs as well as religious beliefs; but it has also ruled in Gillette v. United States (1971) against objections to specific wars as grounds for conscientious objection....


_________________
Diagnosed in 2015 with ASD Level 1 by the University of Utah Health Care Autism Spectrum Disorder Clinic using the ADOS-2 Module 4 assessment instrument [11/30] -- Screened in 2014 with ASD by using the University of Cambridge Autism Research Centre AQ (Adult) [43/50]; EQ-60 for adults [11/80]; FQ [43/135]; SQ (Adult) [130/150] self-reported screening inventories -- Assessed since 1978 with an estimated IQ [≈145] by several clinicians -- Contact on WrongPlanet.net by private message (PM)