wefunction wrote:
It's amazing how far people will go to justify themselves. Privilege is not a new concept, not in identification or practice; but, I suppose I can see where someone would believe it only began to exist from the moment that they learned about it.
I'm not sure if you were aiming this dismissive comment at anyone in particular.
I tend to see privilege as a non racial issue. But maybe that's a British thing.
I see it firstly as coming from class. The landed gentry, inherited wealth, money to pay for private education, going to Oxford or Cambridge, knowing the 'right' people, being able to afford unpaid internships and being supported by mummy and daddy while forging a career in London. Generations of people who have had power and influence, and have passed this on to their children, without the children necessarily having the talent or having worked hard to earn it. See David Cameron and George Osborne (Prime Minister and Chancellor of the Exchequer).
But there is another kind of privilege. Coming from a family, no matter how poor, where education matters. In this country, poor white boys tend to do very badly at school, because there is no longer a culture of education in many poor white families. Bangladeshi and Pakistani kids don't tend to do very well either. Conversely Hindu and Sikh children and Chinese children, do well, because their parents prize education and working hard. While educational attainment can be broken down by racial/religious group, it can be seen that it is not just poverty and race that make the difference. It is the attitude of the family to education. If a child is encouraged at home, has discipline and works hard, health and ability permitting, they can do well. For example, I've seen a lot of psychiatrists in my life, 90% have been of Indian origin.
I recognise that America is different, its history is very different to the UK's. But I thought America was the land of opportunity?