Page 2 of 4 [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Moondust
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 29 May 2012
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,558

02 Aug 2012, 6:44 pm

Thank you very much for the example, Nonperson! I wonder how this writer gathered so much insight...


_________________
There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats - Albert Schweitzer


DrPenguin
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 259

02 Aug 2012, 8:42 pm

Nonperson wrote:
It's difficult to pull one thing out that would explain it all, but what at once impressed and dismayed me at once was the idea that the "extreme NT" view of the world consists not of beliefs based on logic but on social consensus, which become more or less "true" depending on the confidence with which they're expressed/denied and the status of the speaker, and that NT's in conversation are usually dealing only in these cultural symbols and their connection to the NTs' identities rather than thinking about any real thing to which the words should refer. I don't know if I communicated it really clearly there, though, maybe someone else can do it better.

An example of a situation it would explain to me, though, would be the way people tend to debate politics: one person might make a statement about abortion and the other will "debate" by saying something about gay marriage: two completely unrelated topics, but NT's see no problem with lumping them together because they are linked in the cultural reality. Or someone might make a nuanced, middle-of-the-road statement about, say, gun laws, but a pro-gun-control NT will react as though he's talking to some gun nut and an NRA member will fire back stereotypes about "liberals". It's not the arguments that matter but the attack or support of a predefined group the person identifies with, and the other person is either an ally or an adversary.


I'd say there are a fair few people like that but it's mostly when there 'special' interest is threatened so the neutral party would have to word it differently so as the other party doesn't come to the wrong conclusion.
'owning guns is a right but there has to be some gun laws to stop the wrong people owning them' or 'people should be allowed to own guns as its a right, but with laws in place to control who owns them' both mean the same but the first would fit the pro gun the second a anti gun.


_________________
AQ 41

Your Aspie score: 139 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 68 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


BorgPrince
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 6 Dec 2011
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 141
Location: Neptune

03 Aug 2012, 1:17 pm

I've been reading this book and let me just say, it's probably one of the best books out there for someone on the spectrum. It really helps to understand NT behavior better, which is essential if you want to build relationships outside of your limited, inner world.



paxfilosoof
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 380

05 Aug 2012, 12:22 am

Nonperson wrote:
That was a really interesting book - thanks paxfilosoof! Although of course I have no way of knowing how accurate the description of the inner workings of the NT world is (I wonder what NT's might say) it does fit with a lot of their behavior I've never been able to explain. It is a bit depressing, though, since it kind of confirms my worst fears. Although I sometimes think the way NT's are described in the book as thinking, in myself I consider that, at best, silly play, and, at worst, an error to be rooted out. I can't imagine trying to live my life that way even if I could, since it seems both illogical and somehow immoral to me. This book makes NT's seem less mysterious, but, if anything, more threatening. :(


It's reality, Neurotypicals want to try to ignore that for autistic people.
that's why autism spectrum is stated in the DSM.
Autistic people can chose between this two options:

1. Be themself, they'll generally lose, because neurotypicals can't accept difference only after very much resistance (homosexual movement)
2. Become neurotypical (by social stories), it's like a chimpanzee become bonobo because everyone else is a bonobo.
They generally will not accept your true self. They'll love your fake personality.


To hyperlexia: If you delete this thread, I know for sure you already have adapted to neurotypical behaviour ;-)



Last edited by paxfilosoof on 05 Aug 2012, 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.

paxfilosoof
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 380

05 Aug 2012, 12:25 am

Many autistic are very kind and don't want to 'fight' against neurotypicals, but they're for sure.
They want to control you with the term 'autism' or 'autistic', however, you have much more understanding what you're. Never let someone else say who you're.
It's just a political way of fighting autistic people, and have power on them.

It's the EGO thingy ;)



paxfilosoof
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 380

05 Aug 2012, 12:29 am

DrPenguin wrote:
Nonperson wrote:
It's difficult to pull one thing out that would explain it all, but what at once impressed and dismayed me at once was the idea that the "extreme NT" view of the world consists not of beliefs based on logic but on social consensus, which become more or less "true" depending on the confidence with which they're expressed/denied and the status of the speaker, and that NT's in conversation are usually dealing only in these cultural symbols and their connection to the NTs' identities rather than thinking about any real thing to which the words should refer. I don't know if I communicated it really clearly there, though, maybe someone else can do it better.

An example of a situation it would explain to me, though, would be the way people tend to debate politics: one person might make a statement about abortion and the other will "debate" by saying something about gay marriage: two completely unrelated topics, but NT's see no problem with lumping them together because they are linked in the cultural reality. Or someone might make a nuanced, middle-of-the-road statement about, say, gun laws, but a pro-gun-control NT will react as though he's talking to some gun nut and an NRA member will fire back stereotypes about "liberals". It's not the arguments that matter but the attack or support of a predefined group the person identifies with, and the other person is either an ally or an adversary.


I'd say there are a fair few people like that but it's mostly when there 'special' interest is threatened so the neutral party would have to word it differently so as the other party doesn't come to the wrong conclusion.
'owning guns is a right but there has to be some gun laws to stop the wrong people owning them' or 'people should be allowed to own guns as its a right, but with laws in place to control who owns them' both mean the same but the first would fit the pro gun the second a anti gun.


Not only a few people, more and more people are being selected.



paxfilosoof
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 380

05 Aug 2012, 12:32 am

For everyone:

If the book is really depressive, you should atleast read the last pages.
Don't be afraid of being autistic, if you become neurotypical you'll probably suffer. You can't act your whole life like, a bonobo for example, just because people can't accept you as you're. It's their problem, not your.

If you escape by becoming more neurotypical you only let the next generation of autistic people suffer, and you let yourself suffering by adoptating neurotypical behaviour which is not natural for you.



paxfilosoof
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2012
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 380

05 Aug 2012, 12:43 am

BorgPrince wrote:
I've been reading this book and let me just say, it's probably one of the best books out there for someone on the spectrum. It really helps to understand NT behavior better, which is essential if you want to build relationships outside of your limited, inner world.


My personal opinion is not becoming 'neurotypical' and than find a 'neurotypical' mate. You'll always feel depressed because everything is different in this mate.
Sexual, emotional, rational, etc.
If you really search a good mate I would give you advice to find someone similar, who understand your real SELF and not your fake personality.



Kenjitsuka
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 171
Location: Netherlands

06 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm

paxfilosoof wrote:
They want to control you with the term 'autism' or 'autistic', however, you have much more understanding what you're.


Right, this must be why they force you to wear a badge that says "Autistic!" on all of your shirts and coats. And then they scour through medical databanks to make sure every person in the spectrum has the badges!
So when you show up for a job interview they *know* they'll be in big trouble if they give you a job! [/sarcasm].

In reality, I am glad I can get free consultations and help organizing my life, now that I've finally got the diagnosis.

Your story about stigma is more relevant to mainstream thinking and the ENTIRETY of psychiatric diagnoses... And that's just ignorant dumb people being dumb, not some massive political plot you seem to have conjured up...

Also, who "has power over you"?


_________________
Empathy quotient: 14
Your Aspie score: 185 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 14 of 200
The Broad Autism Phenotype Test: You scored 132 aloof, 126 rigid and 132 pragmatic. IQ: 139. AQ: 45/50


Kenjitsuka
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 171
Location: Netherlands

06 Aug 2012, 1:14 pm

paxfilosoof wrote:
BorgPrince wrote:
I've been reading this book and let me just say, it's probably one of the best books out there for someone on the spectrum. It really helps to understand NT behavior better, which is essential if you want to build relationships outside of your limited, inner world.


My personal opinion is not becoming 'neurotypical' and than find a 'neurotypical' mate. You'll always feel depressed because everything is different in this mate.
Sexual, emotional, rational, etc.
If you really search a good mate I would give you advice to find someone similar, who understand your real SELF and not your fake personality.


You do love taking things to the extreme, don't you?
BorgPrince is merely stating that understanding brings acceptance, that knowledge is power and can empower you to do whatever (like build friendships etc.).
A relationship also includes becoming acquaintances with the woman working at the supermarket, becoming friends with co-workers and so on.
And yes, a romantic relationship does fall into this as well, which is great.
You don't have to act so doom and gloom, I've met many ASD's who live good lives with NT partners, (grand)children, the whole shabang...

By simply learning more about NT behaviour you can escape the limited world you apparently thrive in at the moment.
I truly wonder if you'd consider yourself selfish or not? Or at least so self-absorbed that you don't want to reach out and touch/experience more of the world?
Or are you just scared and jaded by some bad things in your past? I'm working past that myself, and I know one thing for sure:
Blaming "NT's" for everything is in no way helpful, as every good AND bad person is purely an individual. And whether they are NT or ASD makes zero difference in their also being a massive jerk or not

It's kind of incredible how much jaded, cynical people I see on WP that hate all NT's, usually "because they are so selfish in making everything abide by their social conventions and rules". Well, it's just because they are the majority, and it's just how their brain naturally works. They don't make that stuff up just to make it hard for the minority of ASD's! The diagnosis didn't even exist until an incredibly short blink of time in the whole of human civilization... :roll:


_________________
Empathy quotient: 14
Your Aspie score: 185 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 14 of 200
The Broad Autism Phenotype Test: You scored 132 aloof, 126 rigid and 132 pragmatic. IQ: 139. AQ: 45/50


kirayng
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Nov 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,040
Location: Maine, USA

06 Aug 2012, 1:48 pm

Reading it now. <3 Kindle app.



DrPenguin
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2012
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 259

06 Aug 2012, 8:20 pm

Kenjitsuka wrote:
paxfilosoof wrote:
BorgPrince wrote:
I've been reading this book and let me just say, it's probably one of the best books out there for someone on the spectrum. It really helps to understand NT behavior better, which is essential if you want to build relationships outside of your limited, inner world.


My personal opinion is not becoming 'neurotypical' and than find a 'neurotypical' mate. You'll always feel depressed because everything is different in this mate.
Sexual, emotional, rational, etc.
If you really search a good mate I would give you advice to find someone similar, who understand your real SELF and not your fake personality.


You do love taking things to the extreme, don't you?
BorgPrince is merely stating that understanding brings acceptance, that knowledge is power and can empower you to do whatever (like build friendships etc.).
A relationship also includes becoming acquaintances with the woman working at the supermarket, becoming friends with co-workers and so on.
And yes, a romantic relationship does fall into this as well, which is great.
You don't have to act so doom and gloom, I've met many ASD's who live good lives with NT partners, (grand)children, the whole shabang...

By simply learning more about NT behaviour you can escape the limited world you apparently thrive in at the moment.
I truly wonder if you'd consider yourself selfish or not? Or at least so self-absorbed that you don't want to reach out and touch/experience more of the world?
Or are you just scared and jaded by some bad things in your past? I'm working past that myself, and I know one thing for sure:
Blaming "NT's" for everything is in no way helpful, as every good AND bad person is purely an individual. And whether they are NT or ASD makes zero difference in their also being a massive jerk or not

It's kind of incredible how much jaded, cynical people I see on WP that hate all NT's, usually "because they are so selfish in making everything abide by their social conventions and rules". Well, it's just because they are the majority, and it's just how their brain naturally works. They don't make that stuff up just to make it hard for the minority of ASD's! The diagnosis didn't even exist until an incredibly short blink of time in the whole of human civilization... :roll:


Well said, all of my friends are NT(ish) and relatively normal (for a given value of normal). They've always known me as odd but have accepted it.


_________________
AQ 41

Your Aspie score: 139 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 68 of 200
You are very likely an Aspie


Kenjitsuka
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 171
Location: Netherlands

18 Aug 2012, 10:32 am

Picked it up earlier today!
Will post my review when done!


_________________
Empathy quotient: 14
Your Aspie score: 185 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 14 of 200
The Broad Autism Phenotype Test: You scored 132 aloof, 126 rigid and 132 pragmatic. IQ: 139. AQ: 45/50


DominictheStampede
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Age: 41
Gender: Male
Posts: 228

18 Aug 2012, 3:47 pm

Thanks paxfilosoof! :)



Kenjitsuka
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 31 Mar 2009
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 171
Location: Netherlands

19 Aug 2012, 10:59 am

DominictheStampede wrote:
Thanks paxfilosoof! :)


For what?


_________________
Empathy quotient: 14
Your Aspie score: 185 of 200
Your neurotypical (non-autistic) score: 14 of 200
The Broad Autism Phenotype Test: You scored 132 aloof, 126 rigid and 132 pragmatic. IQ: 139. AQ: 45/50


invisiblesilent
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Aug 2012
Age: 43
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,150

19 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm

Nonperson wrote:
It's difficult to pull one thing out that would explain it all, but what at once impressed and dismayed me at once was the idea that the "extreme NT" view of the world consists not of beliefs based on logic but on social consensus, which become more or less "true" depending on the confidence with which they're expressed/denied and the status of the speaker, and that NT's in conversation are usually dealing only in these cultural symbols and their connection to the NTs' identities rather than thinking about any real thing to which the words should refer. I don't know if I communicated it really clearly there, though, maybe someone else can do it better.

An example of a situation it would explain to me, though, would be the way people tend to debate politics: one person might make a statement about abortion and the other will "debate" by saying something about gay marriage: two completely unrelated topics, but NT's see no problem with lumping them together because they are linked in the cultural reality. Or someone might make a nuanced, middle-of-the-road statement about, say, gun laws, but a pro-gun-control NT will react as though he's talking to some gun nut and an NRA member will fire back stereotypes about "liberals". It's not the arguments that matter but the attack or support of a predefined group the person identifies with, and the other person is either an ally or an adversary.


Ouch, that is fairly terrifying if it is accurate. That is kinda how I imagined things to work. Like you I'm quite worried that it might actually be the case - that fits in with the observations I've made. Going to buy the Kindle version now :p